Site icon Able Wealth Management

What Washington Politics Mean for Investors

What Washington Politics Mean For Investors
As the Middle East crisis escalates, there’s a brewing political storm in Washington. Notably, the Congressional House speaker’s position remains vacant following the exits of Kevin McCarthy and Steve Scalise. Upcoming Republican and House votes are scheduled to fill this leadership gap, but a cloud of political challenges hovers. For investors already navigating rising interest rates, Federal Reserve uncertainties, and stock market fluctuations, this political landscape adds to their complex tapestry. So, how can these investors stay focused amid these evolving dynamics?

The Impending Debt and Its Implications for Investors

The projected interest payments on the federal debt are set to surpass historical peaks, calling for a time of introspection. When it comes to financial planning and investing, it’s essential to separate political beliefs from investment decisions. As citizens, voters, and taxpayers, we express our political convictions through voting, campaigning, and community organizing – the mainstays of a thriving democracy. However, the impact of Washington politics on the stock market is often unpredictable. History substantiates that markets can flourish under varying political climates and leadership structures across the White House and Congress.

Investors should be aware that news headlines about Washington’s ongoing conflicts could magnify market uncertainty and heighten concerns. The government needs to agree on a new budget soon. Congress must pass a new spending plan annually to be signed into law by September 30th, marking the government’s fiscal year-end. This year’s budget negotiations resulted in a 45-day funding bill, essentially delaying the inevitable. The ticking clock amplifies the uncertainty of meeting a mid-November deadline without leadership and consensus in the House.

The Debt Ceiling Suspension Deal: A Temporary Solution?

A more urgent issue is the debt ceiling suspension deal struck earlier this year, which merely postponed the problem until January 2025. While budget establishment is critical for maintaining government services, not raising the debt ceiling could be catastrophic, risking a potential government default. Despite the U.S. never defaulting on its debt obligations, the procrastination in these negotiations is worrisome. A default on Treasury securities, though not the most likely scenario, would send shockwaves through the market and economy in unprecedented ways.
The national debt’s size is a mutual concern for investors and everyday citizens. With the debt exceeding the previous ceiling level of $31.4 trillion or 119% of GDP, this complex issue requires a thorough examination. It involves political preferences over spending and taxation, entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, emergency spending programs like those enacted during the pandemic, among others. It’s worth noting that a more accurate measure of the national debt, known as “net debt,” excludes what the government owes itself. This measure has reached 94% of GDP.
Federal Interest Payments
This chart shows the level of interest payments that the federal government pays on the national debt each year. You can clearly see that it has risen in recent years, both because the national debt has grown and also because interest rates have risen.

The Rise in Interest Payments: A Cause for Concern?

The surge in interest payments is not solely due to accumulated debts but also due to interest rates reaching levels unseen since 2007. Interest payments have burgeoned in recent years to $476 billion in 2022, a record high. As a percentage of GDP, interest payments are still lower than in the 1980s and 1990s when interest rates were much higher. However, research by the Congressional Budget Office projects these interest payments could skyrocket above $1.4 trillion, or 3.7% of GDP, in ten years.
Unfortunately, there are no easy fixes to this issue, especially as fiscal discipline has been overlooked in Washington for some time. Despite the escalating debt level, the stock market has performed impressively throughout many of these periods. Reacting to news on the national debt could have caused investors to miss significant market upturns, such as the bull market beginning in 2009 and the strong rally that started in mid-2020.
Conclusion
While politics matter in many ways, investors should keep a balanced perspective when making investment decisions. In the coming months, it will be more critical than ever not to be swayed by Washington headlines. This introspective approach will prompt investors to question their beliefs and biases, especially when confronted with societal pressures.
History shows that the stock market can perform well in a variety of different environments, regardless of who controls the White House and Congress. Investors who made portfolio decisions based on politics over the past few cycles would have missed out on strong returns.

Disclaimer: This blog post is not intended to trivialize the humanitarian impact of the conflict but aims to address the financial concerns that investors may have in light of recent events.

Exit mobile version